Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Khalili-Tari results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 370 hits . Analysis detected 2,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,884 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Khalili-Tari is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Daniel Khalili-Tari
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst