Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Pietromarchi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,830 hits . Analysis detected 18,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,581 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,452 of 6,628 authors). This Virginia Pietromarchi is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Virginia Pietromarchi
Author details
Total words: 19,581
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst