Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Andrew Marshall results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 2,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,609 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Marshall is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Andrew Marshall
Author details
Total words: 3,609
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst