Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megha Bahree results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Recency Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 2,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,057 of 6,162 authors). This Megha Bahree is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Megha Bahree
Author details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst