Author summary
85%1 analyzed article/video1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megha Bahree results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 2,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,057 of 6,162 authors). This Megha Bahree is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Megha Bahree
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
67%Megha Bahree (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos