Publication summary
1% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Advocate results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,116 hits . Analysis detected 6,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,872 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (374 of 379 publications). This The Advocate is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 19,872
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst