Author summary
3% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Advocate results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 878 hits . Analysis detected 5,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,627 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,267 of 6,427 authors). This The Advocate is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. The Advocate
Author details
Total words: 14,627
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst