Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Rabalais results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 211 hits . Analysis detected 1,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,362 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,997 of 6,630 authors). This Scott Rabalais is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Scott Rabalais
Author details
Total words: 1,362
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst