Explainer-What to know about the US outbreak of intestinal illness cyclosporiasis 22%

By Reuters69%

7/13/2026, 10:07:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 592 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,058 of 20,406 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the article peer group.

July 13 (Reuters) - Cases of an intestinal infection from the cyclospora parasite that causes diarrhea, nausea and other gastrointestinal symptoms have risen steadily in recent months across the United States, with 31 states reporting infections, ‌according to the U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
Michigan on Monday reported 2,640 cases. 
WHAT IS IT? 
Cyclosporiasis is ‌an intestinal infection that can be contracted by consuming food  typically raw fruits and vegetables  or water contaminated with feces, according to the CDC. 
Symptoms can ​range from mild to severe, with children, older adults and people with weakened immune systems facing a higher risk of serious illness. 
While cyclosporiasis is rarely life-threatening, untreated infections can persist for weeks and may lead to hospitalization, particularly because of dehydration. 
The U.S. has had previous outbreaks of the disease. 
Michigan, for instance, said it typically records 40 to 50 cases annually. 
WHERE IS THE ‌OUTBREAK? 
The current U.S. outbreak, which began on May ⁠1, is centered in Michigan, with Ohio and New York also reporting high numbers of cases. 
Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Texas have all reported 31 cases or ⁠more as of July 9, according to the CDC, which tallied confirmed cases at 843. 
It said 86 of those people had been hospitalized. 
The CDC figures lag because of delays in states reporting to the federal agency. 
Case counts are expected to rise as the ​CDC ​receives more data, with delays between exposure and case confirmation potentially ​taking up to six weeks. 
Cases typically rise from ‌May 1 through August 31, the CDC said. 
Sick people ranged in age from 5 to 88 years, with a median age of 44, and 59% were female. 
WHAT IS THE SOURCE? 
The CDC and state health departments have not identified the source of the food contamination. 
They and the FDA are tracing back from where ill people reported eating or purchasing food to points along the supply chain that can go back to the farm where an ingredient was grown. 
They may use genetic sequencing. 
WHAT CAN ‌PEOPLE DO TO PROTECT THEMSELVES? 
The parasite lives in contaminated food or ​water and is not commonly transmitted directly from person to person. 
Michigan said past ​outbreaks were linked to bagged salad mixes and kits, ​fresh cilantro and basil, raspberries, snow peas and green onions. 
It advised consumers to buy whole ‌heads of lettuce and throw away outer leaves ​and to cook leafy greens and ​other items when possible. 
Ohio advised people to wash their hands with soap and water before and after preparing raw fruit and vegetables, to wash fruits and vegetables thoroughly and to scrub firm fruits and vegetables with a clean ​brush. 
For people who have cyclosporiasis, the CDC ‌recommends treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, an antibiotic commonly sold as Bactrim, taken twice daily for seven to 10 ​days. 
People living with HIV may require longer treatment, according to the agency. 
(Reporting by Siddhi Mahatole and Padmanabhan ​Ananthan in Bengaluru; Editing by Caroline Humer and Matthew Lewis) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Reuters: 2.8%Associated Press: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Reuters: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 8.9%Reuters: 4.2%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 5.6%Reuters: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Reuters: 1.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 3.5%Reuters: 10.4%Associated Press: 5.4%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.7%Reuters: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 3.4%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.9%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Reuters: 10.5%Associated Press: 7.4%Negativity Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 4.2%Associated Press: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.1%Reuters: 4.9%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias10.1%This article: 6.6%Reuters: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 2.7%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.6%Reuters: 5.2%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority12.6%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.2%Associated Press: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 3.0%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 4.0%Associated Press: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Reuters: 4.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.7%Reuters: 3.3%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.7%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Reuters: 2.7%Associated Press: 1.8%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.6%Reuters: 3.1%Associated Press: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 21.9%Reuters: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination21.9%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reuters: 0.2%Associated Press: 3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

516 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.