Topic summary
30% 17 analyzed articles/videos 10,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclosporiasis results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 4,017 hits . Analysis detected 36,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,557 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,233 of 15,435 topics). This Cyclosporiasis is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Cyclosporiasis
Topic details
Total words: 49,557
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score17 analyzed articles49.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/21/2026, 12:05:49 PM