Author summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Scott results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,457 hits . Analysis detected 13,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,947 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,545 of 6,530 authors). This Dylan Scott is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Dylan Scott
Author details
Total words: 15,947
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst