Author summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Ramirez results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 600 hits . Analysis detected 2,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,690 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,599 of 6,244 authors). This Cindy Ramirez is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Cindy Ramirez
Author details
Total words: 3,690
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst