Author summary
48%1 analyzed article/video877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Good News results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,631 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,710 of 6,316 authors). This Public Good News is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Public Good News
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
42%Public Good News (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,631
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos