Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Good News results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Loss Aversion , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 1,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,631 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,710 of 6,316 authors). This Public Good News is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Public Good News
Author details
Total words: 2,631
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst