Author summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hilary Brueck results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 4,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,042 of 6,628 authors). This Hilary Brueck is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Hilary Brueck
Author details
Total words: 5,340
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst