Author summary
83%2 analyzed articles/videos840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kashmira Gander results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 3,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,482 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,246 of 6,359 authors). This Kashmira Gander is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Kashmira Gander
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
49%Kashmira Gander (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,482
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate