Author summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kashmira Gander results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 3,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,482 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,246 of 6,359 authors). This Kashmira Gander is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Kashmira Gander
Author details
Total words: 3,482
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst