Author summary
13%7 analyzed articles/videos6,283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rae Deng results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,625 hits. Analysis detected 15,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,798 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,012 of 6,244 authors). This Rae Deng is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Rae Deng
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
4%Rae Deng (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,798
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate