Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intestinal Illness results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 739 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,058 of 15,780 topics). This Intestinal Illness is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Intestinal Illness
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos