Topic summary
⁠19%3 analyzed articles/videos2,541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Outbreaks results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 4,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,648 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,616 of 16,558 topics). This Public Health Outbreaks is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Public Health Outbreaks
Topic details
Total words: 9,648
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos