Author summary
16%6 analyzed articles/videos2,840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billy Penn Staff results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 925 hits. Analysis detected 6,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,187 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,895 of 6,629 authors). This Billy Penn Staff is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Billy Penn Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
12%Billy Penn Staff (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,187
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate