Keyword summary
⁠24%5 analyzed articles/videos4,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contaminated Food results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,205 hits. Analysis detected 13,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,695 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (30,507 of 35,675 keywords). This Contaminated Food is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Contaminated Food
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠15%Contaminated Food (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,695
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos