Author summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabby Landsverk results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 4,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,145 of 6,362 authors). This Gabby Landsverk is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Gabby Landsverk
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠67%Gabby Landsverk (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.3%9.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos