Author summary
84% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Pantorno results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 1,402 hits . Analysis detected 7,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,940 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,072 of 6,628 authors). This Joe Pantorno is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Joe Pantorno
Author details
Total words: 5,940
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.6% 23.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst