Author summary
34% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Reynolds results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,399 hits . Analysis detected 5,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,485 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,792 of 6,628 authors). This Tim Reynolds is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Tim Reynolds
Author details
Total words: 9,485
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.8% 14.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst