Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesse Campigotto results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 3,684 hits . Analysis detected 22,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,984 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,301 of 6,136 authors). This Jesse Campigotto is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Jesse Campigotto
Author details
Total words: 30,984
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst