Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Crosbie results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 2,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (601 of 6,628 authors). This Jack Crosbie is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Jack Crosbie
Author details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 35.8% 35.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.1% 19.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.7% 22.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 23.7%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst