Publication summary
38% 51 analyzed articles/videos 24,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rolling Stone results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 9,850 hits . Analysis detected 96,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 113,499 analyzed words across 51 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 36% (247 of 383 publications). This Rolling Stone is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 113,499
Article count: 51
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score51 analyzed articles113.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 8.7% 8.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst