Author summary
11%6 analyzed articles/videos3,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Dillon results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 656 hits. Analysis detected 6,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,360 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,328 of 6,364 authors). This Nancy Dillon is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Nancy Dillon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Nancy Dillon (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,360
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate