Author summary
43% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charisma Madarang results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,016 hits . Analysis detected 8,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,774 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,177 of 6,455 authors). This Charisma Madarang is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Charisma Madarang
Author details
Total words: 9,774
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst