Wildfire Smoke Forces the Black Keys, Creed, and More to Postpone Concerts ⁠65%

By Charisma Madarang⁠48%

7/16/2026, 5:56:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Loss Aversion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 585 faulty-reasoning hits from 382 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (7,721 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the article peer group.

As eyes, throats, and lungs burn amid wildfires raging across swaths of the northeastern United States and southern Canada, a growing list of artists are either postponing or cancelling their concerts due to the hazardous air quality. 
The Black Keys were among the musicians postponing their shows. 
“We’re sorry we won’t get to see y’all in Chicago tonight, but keeping everyone safe is the most important thing,” said the band in a social media post, adding that their concerts had been rescheduled to Oct. 20 and 21. 
“Hang onto your tickets and we’ll see y’all real soon.” 
The group said that all current tickets will be honored and the venue will reach out to ticket holders directly. 
In New York, Mavis Staples‘ performance at SummerStage in Central Park — which was set to take place on July 16 in the evening — was cancelled due to the unsafe air quality index. 
While the soul hitmaker’s Instagram account stated that the show might be rescheduled and recommended checking the SummerStage website for updates, nothing has been confirmed at time of publication. 
War and Treaty, who had traveled from Nashville to New York for their show at Robert F. 
Wagner, Jr. 
Park, also cancelled their July 16 show. 
The husband-and-wife duo broke the news to fans in an Instagram video and in the caption wrote, “We’re heartbroken to share that tonight’s New York City show has been canceled due to the city’s state of emergency related to the ongoing wildfire conditions. 
We were so looking forward to being with you tonight. 
Thank you for your understanding. 
We send our blessings and heart to all the first responders and communities fighting the fires. 
In Minnesota, Creed‘s performance on July 16 was postponed due to “unsafe air conditions resulting from the ongoing Canadian wildfires.” 
A post on the group’s Instagram said that while “Scott, Mark, Brian and Flip were incredibly excited to perform for the sold-out crowd,” given the harsh environmental conditions and “challenges they create for the band, crew, venue, staff and attendees, the decision has been made to move the performance.” 
The show was moved to Sept. 
5. and tickets for the July 16 performance will be valid on the new date. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%Charisma Madarang: 3.5%Rolling Stone: 2.9%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 1.6%Charisma Madarang: 0.1%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Anchoring Bias1.6%This article: 11.5%Charisma Madarang: 3.6%Rolling Stone: 3.2%Availability Heuristic11.5%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.2%Rolling Stone: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.2%Rolling Stone: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 1.3%Rolling Stone: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Charisma Madarang: 6.5%Rolling Stone: 5.6%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 18.1%Charisma Madarang: 0.9%Rolling Stone: 0.6%Loss Aversion18.1%This article: 3.9%Charisma Madarang: 1.0%Rolling Stone: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.2%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Charisma Madarang: 2.4%Rolling Stone: 2.0%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.3%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Charisma Madarang: 11.2%Rolling Stone: 7.5%Negativity Bias9.7%This article: 13.1%Charisma Madarang: 3.2%Rolling Stone: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.3%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.5%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 2.3%Rolling Stone: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.4%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Charisma Madarang: 6.2%Rolling Stone: 4.8%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.1%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 3.5%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Charisma Madarang: 0.1%Rolling Stone: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 1.2%Rolling Stone: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.1%Rolling Stone: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 5.4%Rolling Stone: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.8%Rolling Stone: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.8%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 5.3%Rolling Stone: 5.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 1.4%Rolling Stone: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.5%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.1%Charisma Madarang: 9.9%Rolling Stone: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion25.1%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.9%Rolling Stone: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 2.8%Rolling Stone: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.2%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.7%Rolling Stone: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.5%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 2.9%Rolling Stone: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.2%Rolling Stone: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.3%Charisma Madarang: 2.8%Rolling Stone: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.3%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.0%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.5%Charisma Madarang: 3.6%Rolling Stone: 1.5%Unattributed Quote10.5%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 2.8%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.7%Charisma Madarang: 6.6%Rolling Stone: 8.6%Biased Writer Voice9.7%This article: 1.3%Charisma Madarang: 1.6%Rolling Stone: 1.3%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 2.1%Rolling Stone: 1.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.4%Rolling Stone: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charisma Madarang: 0.3%Rolling Stone: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

382 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers60%attributed speech153writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThe Black Keys • 40 words • 100.0% coverageThe Black Keys • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThe Black Keys • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMavis Staples • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWar and Treaty • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWar and Treaty • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWar and Treaty • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWar and Treaty • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWar and Treaty • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCreed • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Creed

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words21% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.2 ptsWriter: 24.2%Creed: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.