Topic summary
26% 29 analyzed articles/videos 17,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Concerts results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 7,166 hits . Analysis detected 50,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 73,599 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,200 of 15,781 topics). This Concerts is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Concerts
Topic details
Total words: 73,599
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score29 analyzed articles73.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst