Author summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos1,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Blough results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 3,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,221 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,906 of 6,244 authors). This Jessica Blough is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Jessica Blough
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
38%Jessica Blough (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,221
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate