Publication summary
45% 15 analyzed articles/videos 4,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WDIV results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 1,114 hits . Analysis detected 12,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,405 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 24% (291 of 379 publications). This WDIV is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 18,405
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst