WDIV31%

The Latest: US military identifies 2 soldiers killed in Jordan by Iran 42%

By Associated Press60%

7/20/2026, 5:50:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 599 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,886 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the article peer group.

Video circulating online appears to show the moment Iranian missiles hit an airbase in Jordan, killing two American service members. 
Another remains missing after the Friday attack. 
And another U.S. service member was killed in Iraq on Saturday, reflecting how troops face lethal risks without being deployed into Iran. 
U.S. gas prices jumped to an average of $4 a gallon again Monday, and benchmark Brent crude rose above $90 a barrel, further fueling a global energy crisis sparked by the conflict. 
US launches ninth night of Iran strikes 
The U.S. military’s Central Command said Monday’s strikes targeted “Iranian military command centers, air defense and coastal surveillance sites, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites and communications networks.” 
Iranian authorities on Sunday said at least 50 people have been killed and 517 wounded in the latest rounds of U.S. strikes. 
Since the war began on Feb. 
28, 17 U.S. service members have been killed. 
The U.S. military said the latest service member was killed in Iraq on Saturday during the “controlled detonation” of a downed Iranian drone. 
“We hit them very hard again tonight,” Trump said. 
“And we did that in honor” of the soldiers killed. 
Another vessel is ablaze in the strait as Iran targets tankers 
As the strikes began, a vessel caught fire early Monday in the Strait of Hormuz after being hit by a projectile near the coastline of Oman, the British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said. 
The crew abandoned the vessel, which was adrift and still ablaze hours later, the UKMTO said. 
The route around Oman has been the one the U.S. military has encouraged ships to travel to avoid Iran’s control. 
The Guard later claimed it was targeting tankers in the strait. 
US bombing of Iran expands as American troops killed and Tehran retaliates 
The United States targeted Iran with a new round of airstrikes early Monday after announcing the death of another American service member, hitting around a northwestern city believed to be home to underground missile bases. 
Iran responded by attacking Bahrain, home to the U.S. 
Navy’s 5th Fleet, and Kuwait. 
Step by step, the U.S. and Iran have inched closer to all-out war. 
Last month’s interim deal meant to permanently end the fighting has crumbled. 
Traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has largely stalled. 
Both sides have targeted civilian infrastructure relied on by millions of people. 
Meanwhile, benchmark Brent crude rose Monday above $90 a barrel, further fueling a global energy crisis sparked by the conflict. 
An average gallon of regular gasoline in the U.S. rose to $4, putting more pressure on American wallets ahead of midterm elections this fall. 
 Read more 
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. 
All rights reserved. 
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%WDIV: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Associated Press: 3.2%WDIV: 3.0%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WDIV: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%WDIV: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.2%Associated Press: 7.1%WDIV: 4.4%Framing Effect20.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%WDIV: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WDIV: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%WDIV: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 1.6%WDIV: 0.7%Pessimism Bias2.7%This article: 21.3%Associated Press: 8.7%WDIV: 6.0%Negativity Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%WDIV: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%WDIV: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%WDIV: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%WDIV: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Associated Press: 1.4%WDIV: 1.1%Recency Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%WDIV: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Associated Press: 3.4%WDIV: 3.9%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.7%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.6%WDIV: 0.2%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 2.7%WDIV: 2.2%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%WDIV: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Associated Press: 4.7%WDIV: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%WDIV: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 28.0%Associated Press: 2.2%WDIV: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)28.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.1%Associated Press: 0.5%WDIV: 1.1%Burden of Proof2.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.2%Associated Press: 1.7%WDIV: 1.9%Anecdotal4.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Associated Press: 1.2%WDIV: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%WDIV: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%WDIV: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 1.1%WDIV: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.0%WDIV: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.1%Associated Press: 0.7%WDIV: 1.9%Indoctrination2.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.4%WDIV: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.6%

475 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers23%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center • 36 words • 0.0% coverageUKMTO • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGuard • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words17% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+52.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 52.6%52.6%Quote-first Misdirection+47.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 47.4%47.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.