Topic summary
85%26 analyzed articles/videos11,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gas Prices results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 6,688 hits. Analysis detected 62,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,764 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,402 of 16,562 topics). This Gas Prices is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score26 analyzed articles49.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate