Author summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Roush results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (226 of 6,561 authors). This Ty Roush is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Ty Roush
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠97%Ty Roush (selected)13%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 327
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510096.6% percentile
12.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles327 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 25.1%25.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 23.6%23.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 25.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 23.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos