Fortune54%

Gas prices snap back to $4 as Trump’s Iran truce unravels 68%

By The Associated Press63%

7/20/2026, 12:39:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 554 faulty-reasoning hits from 250 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,038 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the article peer group.

U.S. gas prices jumped to an average of $4 a gallon again Monday as the U.S. and Iran launched more attacks. 
According to motor club federation AAA, the national average for a gallon of regular gasoline is now back to $4. 
The average price a year ago was $3.14 a gallon. 
The price is a national average, meaning drivers in some states have been paying well over $4 a gallon for a while now, while others pay less. 
Prices vary between states due to factors ranging from nearby supply to differing tax rates. 
People around the world are also dealing with high gas prices as a result of the war. 
Gas prices first went over $4 a gallon on average at the end of March. 
They dipped below that in mid-June and continued to fall as crude oil prices eased when the U.S. and Iran reached an interim deal. 
Even then, President Donald Trump expressed frustration that gas prices weren’t falling as quickly as oil prices. 
Affordability is likely to be a key issue for voters in the U.S. midterm elections, and higher gas and oil prices can help push up prices for groceries and other goods. 
Oil prices have climbed again in recent days as the U.S. and Iran move closer to resuming an all-out war. 
Brent crude, the international standard, rose 3.2% to $90.95 per barrel Monday and benchmark U.S. crude climbed 2.8% to $84.04 per barrel. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%Fortune: 4.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%Fortune: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 27.6%The Associated Press: 3.2%Fortune: 3.3%Availability Heuristic27.6%This article: 6.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Fortune: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Fortune: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Fortune: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 11.1%Fortune: 6.7%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Fortune: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.8%The Associated Press: 0.7%Fortune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%Fortune: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%The Associated Press: 1.7%Fortune: 2.5%Pessimism Bias12.4%This article: 34.4%The Associated Press: 11.0%Fortune: 7.0%Negativity Bias34.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Fortune: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Fortune: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Fortune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Fortune: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%Fortune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%Fortune: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 17.6%The Associated Press: 2.0%Fortune: 1.5%Recency Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Fortune: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Fortune: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Fortune: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.0%The Associated Press: 3.8%Fortune: 4.8%Appeal to Authority8.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Fortune: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Fortune: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%The Associated Press: 3.0%Fortune: 6.0%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Fortune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Fortune: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 5.6%Fortune: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Fortune: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 49.6%The Associated Press: 2.8%Fortune: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)49.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Fortune: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%Fortune: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.4%The Associated Press: 1.7%Fortune: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Fortune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Fortune: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Fortune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Fortune: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.8%The Associated Press: 1.2%Fortune: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 3.9%Fortune: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice4.4%This article: 12.4%The Associated Press: 0.7%Fortune: 1.3%Indoctrination12.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Fortune: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.0%

250 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech213writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coveragemotor club federation AAA • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words54% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%motor club federation AAA: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-14.6 ptsWriter: 14.6%motor club federation AAA: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%motor club federation AAA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.