Topic summary
50% 126 analyzed articles/videos 66,749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Relations results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 35,077 hits . Analysis detected 349,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 387,386 analyzed words across 126 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,580 of 15,447 topics). This US Iran Relations is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. US Iran Relations
Topic details
Total words: 387,386
Article count: 126
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score126 analyzed articles387.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst