Author summary
65%35 analyzed articles/videos37,899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Turse results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 32,965 hits. Analysis detected 199,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 189,237 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,383 of 6,135 authors). This Nick Turse is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Nick Turse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
29%Nick Turse (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 189,237
Article count: 35
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score35 analyzed articles189.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.8%7.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate