Author summary
85% 16 analyzed articles/videos 4,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Chapman results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 5,916 hits . Analysis detected 42,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,545 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,351 of 6,359 authors). This Matthew Chapman is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Matthew Chapman
Author details
Total words: 26,545
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles26.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.0% 16.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst