Publication summary
44% 82 analyzed articles/videos 27,788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These STAT results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 12,981 hits . Analysis detected 126,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 152,830 analyzed words across 82 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 34% (273 of 410 publications). This STAT is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 152,830
Article count: 82
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score82 analyzed articles152.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst