Author summary
41%3 analyzed articles/videos1,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These O. Rose Broderick results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,019 hits. Analysis detected 7,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,838 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,068 of 6,204 authors). This O. Rose Broderick is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
O. Rose Broderick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%O. Rose Broderick (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,838
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos