Author summary
35% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theresa Gaffney results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,609 hits . Analysis detected 14,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,038 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (5,026 of 6,628 authors). This Theresa Gaffney is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Theresa Gaffney
Author details
Total words: 17,038
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst