Author summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Branswell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 719 hits . Analysis detected 6,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,670 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,742 of 6,628 authors). This Helen Branswell is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Helen Branswell
Author details
Total words: 8,670
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst