STAT44%

There are already more U.S. measles cases this year than in all of 2025 37%

By Associated Press60%

7/24/2026, 9:13:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 941 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,980 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the article peer group.

The number of measles cases in the U.S. has surpassed the record-breaking tally for all of 2025, with five more months of 2026 still to come. 
The U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention logged 2,318 cases of measles as of Thursday, according to an agency update on Friday. 
The nation had 2,289 cases in 2025, the worst year for measles in more than three decades. 
Now, 2026 has easily become the U.S.’s worst year for measles since 1991, as major outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah and Arizona have sickened hundreds and smaller clusters of cases sparked in other states. 
In November, international health officials will meet to determine if the U.S. and Mexico have lost their measles-free status. 
The U.S. eliminated local measles spread in 2000 by maintaining high vaccination rates, which have fallen in recent years to below the 95% coverage needed to prevent outbreaks. 
Measles cases are undercounted 
While measles cases in the U.S. are climbing, it may be impossible to say exactly how far-reaching the spread is. 
Public health departments and disease researchers have long acknowledged that official counts are incomplete, because some people get sick and don’t seek out treatment  something not unique to measles. 
Furthermore, experts say the spread might be greater than what’s known because the virus is one of the most contagious known to medicine and vaccination rates nationwide have declined. 
National vaccination rates for measles, mumps and rubella  which dropped to 92.5% among kindergartners in the 2024-25 school year, from 95.2% in 2019-20  obscure even lower rates in certain communities. 
In Utah, where public health officials have fought measles for more than a year, the virus has sickened more than 700 people during that time, according to the state health department. 
Experts relying on mathematical modeling and genetic analyses indicate that a large outbreak on the Utah-Arizona border could be around three to four times bigger than what’s currently known, state epidemiologist Dr. 
Leisha Nolen said. 
The picture is muddier in South Carolina, which had the nation’s largest outbreak in 35 years. 
There, the 997 total is likely an undercount, the state health department has said, but it doesn’t know by how much. 
Dr. 
Brannon Traxler, acting director of the state department of health, said the undercount is “impossible to know and may vary during the course of an outbreak.” 
Data gaps can make it hard to reliably estimate an outbreak’s true scope. 
Experts say hospitalization rates can be a good barometer, but measles hospitalizations are not required to be reported in every state. 
“If we really had some kind of solid gold standard for the percentage of all cases that have hospitalization or some measure of severity, then that would be another way of estimating the outbreak size that we could see if it’s consistent with these other methods,” said Damon Toth, an applied mathematician at the University of Utah’s medical school who is working on one of the Utah outbreak analyses. 
Researchers are still analyzing the 2025 Texas outbreak 
In Texas, researchers are still working to estimate the size of the state’s 2025 outbreak and early findings show it might have been nearly twice the size of the 762 known cases. 
Rémy Pasco, a mathematical epidemiologist at the University of Colorado Boulder who is working on the analysis, said the undercounts were unsurprising. 
In the absence of an adequate community vaccination rate  95% according to health experts  “there’s just not much you can do about measles once you have it,” he said. 
The CDC defines an outbreak as three or more linked cases. 
But by the time three such cases are identified in communities with low vaccination rates and less disease surveillance, “either you missed the previous ones or you’re going to have a lot more,” he added. 
Dr. 
Varun Shetty, Texas’ chief state epidemiologist, said there were instances where people tested positive for measles but health officials couldn’t confirm who else was in the person’s household or if they were sick. 
“What we’re able to count and report is almost always an underestimate of what actually occurred, because it relies on people being willing to be able to get tested, to share information with healthcare providers and with public health,” Shetty said. 
“Sometimes that just doesn’t happen.” 
The state health department previously reported that 182 probable measles cases went unconfirmed in March 2025 among minors in Gaines County  the epicenter of the outbreak  due to a lack of information. 
The confirmed case count for the western Texas county for the whole outbreak is 414. 
Shetty expects to keep seeing measles cases and even outbreaks because so many people are unprotected. 
“It’s really critical, not only for individual people, but for communities, to have high vaccination coverage,” he said. 
Vaccination is about protecting others, physician says 
Dr. 
Mark Roberts, retired director of the Public Health Dynamics Lab at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, worries most for the people he calls “innocent bystanders.” 
Research and measles modeling by his team shows those who cannot get vaccinated  young babies, people with weak immune systems and those who rarely don’t get robust immunity from the vaccine  bear the brunt of outbreaks early on. 
Some people see skipping vaccination as like deciding not to wear a seat belt in a car, Roberts said. 
“Not vaccinating your kid is like saying, ‘I don’t want my car to have brakes,’” he said. 
“Because it’s other people that you can hit. 
It’s not just you in your car. 
It’s other people.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.3%Associated Press: 2.2%STAT: 3.4%Confirmation Bias2.3%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 1.3%Anchoring Bias5.2%This article: 10.4%Associated Press: 3.2%STAT: 3.9%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%STAT: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Associated Press: 1.1%STAT: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias10.7%This article: 9.7%Associated Press: 7.1%STAT: 8.2%Framing Effect9.7%This article: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.5%STAT: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 3.0%Associated Press: 0.6%STAT: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%STAT: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.2%Associated Press: 1.6%STAT: 1.8%Pessimism Bias19.2%This article: 18.2%Associated Press: 8.7%STAT: 8.5%Negativity Bias18.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%STAT: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.3%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%STAT: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%STAT: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%STAT: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Associated Press: 1.4%STAT: 1.6%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%STAT: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.4%Straw Man1.8%This article: 15.0%Associated Press: 3.4%STAT: 4.7%Appeal to Authority15.0%This article: 7.0%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 1.5%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%STAT: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Associated Press: 2.7%STAT: 4.6%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%STAT: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 4.7%STAT: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%STAT: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%STAT: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%STAT: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.7%STAT: 3.3%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 1.2%STAT: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.3%Middle Ground7.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%STAT: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.3%STAT: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%STAT: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.0%STAT: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.7%STAT: 2.1%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%STAT: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%STAT: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%STAT: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

941 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers45%attributed speech520writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageLeisha Nolen • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageBrannon Traxler • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDamon Toth • 69 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRémy Pasco • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRémy Pasco • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRémy Pasco • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageVarun Shetty • 33 words • 0.0% coverageVarun Shetty • 41 words • 0.0% coverageVarun Shetty • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageVarun Shetty • 16 words • 0.0% coverageVarun Shetty • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageMark Roberts • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 40 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMark Roberts • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Damon Toth

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words16% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-0.6 ptsWriter: 0.6%Damon Toth: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.