Keyword summary
48% 53 analyzed articles/videos 30,641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cdc results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 15,890 hits . Analysis detected 116,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 151,001 analyzed words across 53 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,792 of 35,021 keywords). This Cdc is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Cdc
Keyword details
Total words: 151,001
Article count: 53
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score53 analyzed articles151K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 16% 7/21/2026, 12:05:49 PM