Author summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashish K. Jha results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 372 hits . Analysis detected 2,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,669 of 6,215 authors). This Ashish K. Jha is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Ashish K. Jha
Author details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst