Author summary
69%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashish K. Jha results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,669 of 6,215 authors). This Ashish K. Jha is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Ashish K. Jha
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%Ashish K. Jha (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.6%11.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos