FDA reports new outbreak of explosive diarrhea with 72 cases identified 50%

By Beth Mole30%

7/23/2026, 7:22:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 533 faulty-reasoning hits from 447 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.3% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,944 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the article peer group.

The Food and Drug Administration announced on Wednesday that it’s investigating yet another outbreak of Cyclospora, the unicellular foodborne parasite behind a nationwide surge in explosive watery diarrhea illnesses. 
The FDA said 72 cases have been identified in this outbreak, but the agency provided no details on the situation. 
This announcement marks the sixth Cyclospora outbreak investigations the FDA has opened this year. 
Overall, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has gotten reports of more than 11,500 cases (including 4,173 confirmed and over 7,400 probable) from 41 states. 
Among the cases, there have been 308 hospitalizations and no deaths. 
This year’s tally so far—just in July—greatly exceeds the normal number of cases the US sees in a whole year. 
In recent years, the US has reported between 2,000 and 5,000 cases in a year, according to CDC data. 
With a new outbreak announced, the tally of cases is likely to continue climbing. 
Nevertheless, when asked about the national surge in cases earlier this week, anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr. said the situation was “under control.” 
Outbreak responses 
Last week, the FDA and CDC announced that one of the previously identified outbreaks was linked to shredded iceberg lettuce grown in Mexico and distributed by Taylor Farms. 
Some of the lettuce was served at Taco Bell locations and linked cases had been identified in five states: Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and West Virginia. 
Michigan alone has reported 7,664 cases and 106 hospitalizations as of July 23. 
A recall Taylor Farms issued led to the removal of iceberg lettuce the company distributed to 27 states. 
But the recall list was vague, not providing consumers with information on where the lettuce was sold or how consumers could avoid it. 
The FDA reported that some of the lettuce was sold at Walmart stores, while media reports found the lettuce also went to Jack in the Box restaurants, and food distributors Sysco and US Foods. 
It was also sold in blends with romaine lettuce. 
Whether the new outbreak the FDA identified Wednesday is ultimately from an entirely different source or linked to that outbreak remains unclear. 
The FDA did not provide information on where the cases were identified or how they may be linked. 
Similarly, it’s unclear what potential food sources are being investigated, though the FDA said a traceback investigation is underway. 
Both agencies have been hit hard by budget and staffing cuts by the Trump administration. 
In addition to the six Cyclospora outbreaks this year, the FDA has 10 other open investigations on foodborne outbreaks, including outbreaks caused by Salmonella, E. coli, Clostridium botulinum, and Listeria monocytogenes. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.8%Beth Mole: 2.6%Ars Technica: 2.8%Confirmation Bias1.8%This article: 4.3%Beth Mole: 1.4%Ars Technica: 1.2%Anchoring Bias4.3%This article: 21.5%Beth Mole: 3.0%Ars Technica: 2.4%Availability Heuristic21.5%This article: 5.8%Beth Mole: 1.2%Ars Technica: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.3%Ars Technica: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 1.3%Ars Technica: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Beth Mole: 6.4%Ars Technica: 3.4%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.9%Ars Technica: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Beth Mole: 0.4%Ars Technica: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 10.3%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect10.3%This article: 2.5%Beth Mole: 1.9%Ars Technica: 4.2%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 7.6%Beth Mole: 1.9%Ars Technica: 1.7%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 10.1%Beth Mole: 10.0%Ars Technica: 6.2%Negativity Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.4%Ars Technica: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.9%Ars Technica: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.3%Ars Technica: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 1.5%Ars Technica: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.5%Ars Technica: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Beth Mole: 1.1%Ars Technica: 1.0%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 1.1%Ars Technica: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Beth Mole: 4.7%Ars Technica: 4.1%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 4.9%Beth Mole: 0.7%Ars Technica: 1.1%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.6%Ars Technica: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Beth Mole: 2.9%Ars Technica: 3.8%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 4.0%Beth Mole: 0.4%Ars Technica: 0.2%Red Herring4.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 3.3%Ars Technica: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.7%Ars Technica: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Beth Mole: 2.2%Ars Technica: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.8%Beth Mole: 0.8%Ars Technica: 0.5%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.3%Ars Technica: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.9%Ars Technica: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.0%Beth Mole: 1.5%Ars Technica: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.0%Ars Technica: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.4%Ars Technica: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.1%Ars Technica: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Beth Mole: 1.5%Ars Technica: 1.5%Unattributed Quote3.8%This article: 3.8%Beth Mole: 0.7%Ars Technica: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 6.3%Beth Mole: 8.8%Ars Technica: 4.5%Biased Writer Voice6.3%This article: 1.8%Beth Mole: 1.1%Ars Technica: 1.0%Indoctrination1.8%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 2.0%Ars Technica: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.2%Ars Technica: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beth Mole: 0.3%Ars Technica: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

447 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers31%attributed speech310writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFDA • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageRobert F. Kennedy Jr. • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageFDA and CDC • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTaylor Farms • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageFDA • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words5.8% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.