Topic summary
36% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Outbreaks results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 2,847 hits . Analysis detected 20,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,631 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,545 of 15,391 topics). This Outbreaks is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Outbreaks
Topic details
Total words: 26,631
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles26.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst