Author summary
81% 4 analyzed articles/videos 202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Cirruzzo results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 809 hits . Analysis detected 3,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,298 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,270 of 6,316 authors). This Chelsea Cirruzzo is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Chelsea Cirruzzo
Author details
Total words: 3,298
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 24.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst