STAT44%

Kennedy taps vaccine skeptic for public health emergency role 35%

By Chelsea Cirruzzo80%

7/10/2026, 7:27:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 952 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,309 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the article peer group.

Nominee for key federal health role has a history of questioning vaccines 
Sean Kaufman could clash with Sen. 
Bill Cassidy over his past comments on hepatitis B, Covid-19 shots 
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images 
Washington Correspondent 
Chelsea covers the Department of Health and Human Services with a particular focus on power and influence at the top. 
Confidential tips can be sent via Signal at chelseacirruzzo.42. 
WASHINGTON  The Trump administration’s pick to oversee preparedness and response to public health emergencies and disasters has questioned the use of the hepatitis B vaccine in infants and raised the disproven link between vaccines and autism in past comments reviewed by STAT. 
Those comments by Sean Kaufman, nominated to be Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, are part of an undercurrent of vaccine skepticism among some high-ranking Department of Health and Human Services officials under Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr.  despite efforts from White House officials to steer the conversation away from vaccines . 
They could also set up a clash with Senate health leader Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who will chair Kaufman’s confirmation hearing next week. 
Cassidy has opposed some of the more aggressive vaccine policy changes heralded by Kennedy, including speaking out against delaying the hepatitis B shot, citing his experience as a liver doctor treating patients with the illness. 
But Cassidy backed Kennedy’s confirmation, despite his open discomfort with vaccine skepticism. 
In May, Cassidy lost his reelection bid after Kennedy and President Trump publicly accused him of stymying their Make America Healthy Again agenda. 
Kaufman’s hearing, a joint appearance alongside the nominee for director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Erica Schwartz, will be Cassidy’s first for an HHS nominee since his loss. 
Cassidy, the White House, and Kaufman did not respond to requests for comment. 
Should Kaufman, co-founder of a biosafety consulting firm, be confirmed, he would oversee the nation’s countermeasures in a public health crisis, which include vaccines and personal protective equipment. 
In a now-deleted May 2025 LinkedIn post, Kaufman tells readers that if they call him “an antivaxxer, then I’ll be forced to call you a pedophile” before going on to argue against giving infants the hepatitis B shot. 
“And before you dismiss all this as ‘antivaxxer nonsense,’ consider this: autism,” he writes. 
He goes on to make the case that the hepatitis B vaccine may be linked to an increase in autism cases. 
Decades of research has not found a connection between vaccines and the prevalence of autism. 
Using rhetoric similar to Kennedy and others in the vaccine skeptical movement, Kaufman also raised the question of whether vaccines are linked to a whole host of health issues. 
“Questions surrounding vaccine safety  be it recombinant or mRNA platforms  are not just hypothetical concerns but critical issues that demand honest investigation,” he wrote in the 2025 LinkedIn post. 
“We owe it to the public, especially to those who may have been unintentionally harmed, to move beyond dismissive rhetoric and into transparent, science-based discussions. 
The significant increases in autism, allergies, and other health issues are not mere coincidences or artifacts of better detection  they are signals that deserve our full attention.” 
He similarly questioned giving hepatitis B shots to infants in a May 2025 video, downplaying the risks of the virus as limited to those engaging in risky sexual activity or sharing needles. 
While hepatitis B is primarily transmitted through certain risky behaviors, public health experts say infants can still be exposed in other ways, and that giving the shot to newborns has helped curb mother-to-child transmission. 
The progressive group Protect Our Care called on Cassidy to block Kaufman’s confirmation. 
“There is something very risky here, and it’s letting a science-denier like Mr. 
Kaufman oversee the nation’s emergency supply of vaccines,” Brad Woodhouse, president of the group, told STAT in a statement. 
Kaufman also called offering mRNA Covid-19 vaccines “reckless,” questioning their safety and effectiveness. 
He praised efforts by Kennedy to rescind universal recommendations for Covid-19 vaccines. 
“I don’t think it ever should have been [recommended] in the first place,” he said. 
In separate LinkedIn posts from two and three years ago that are still public, Kaufman defended individuals who he said were fired from their jobs after rejecting Covid-19 vaccine mandates  it has been previously reported that Kaufman has served as an expert witness in cases opposing vaccine mandates  and said he was censored for promoting “the benefits of natural immunity.” 
In one post, he described himself as a “father of three who would rather perish than have any one of his children receive an injection where the risks soundly outweigh the benefits gained,” referring to Covid-19 shots. 
Last year, a panel of vaccine experts handpicked by Kennedy voted to recommend that most parents delay giving their children the hepatitis B vaccine, leading to outcry from public health experts who say that the consequences can be devastating and fatal. 
That recommendation is currently on hold as a challenge to Kennedy’s vaccine policies makes its way through a federal court. 
The panel has also raised questions about the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines, and Kennedy has pulled millions of dollars in funding for the technology. 
Congress , Coronavirus , HHS , Policy , public health , RFK Jr. , Vaccines , White House 
Submit a correction request Reprints 
STAT Plus: White House reviewing top contenders to lead FDA 
STAT Plus: In private meeting, Trump officials push to onshore generic drugmaking 
STAT Plus: Vertex acquires Crinetics Pharmaceuticals for $10 billion as biotech M&A booms 
STAT Plus: Medicare takes another swing at 340B cuts to hospitals 
STAT Plus: Elevance sues government over $115 million tied to Medicare Advantage star ratings 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.2%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.6%STAT: 3.4%Confirmation Bias15.2%This article: 2.6%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.3%STAT: 1.3%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 12.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 5.6%STAT: 3.9%Availability Heuristic12.0%This article: 3.8%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.5%STAT: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 24.5%STAT: 8.2%Framing Effect8.4%This article: 3.9%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.3%STAT: 0.7%Loss Aversion3.9%This article: 2.1%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.5%STAT: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 27.1%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 9.0%STAT: 8.5%Negativity Bias27.1%This article: 7.8%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias7.8%This article: 1.4%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.6%STAT: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.4%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.6%STAT: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.3%STAT: 0.4%In-Group Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.1%STAT: 0.4%Ad Hominem12.6%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.8%STAT: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.3%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.0%STAT: 4.7%Appeal to Authority19.3%This article: 4.9%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.5%STAT: 1.5%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.0%STAT: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 7.0%STAT: 4.6%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.3%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.9%STAT: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion14.3%This article: 1.5%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.4%STAT: 0.9%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 7.2%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 2.2%STAT: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 6.5%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Tu Quoque6.5%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.9%STAT: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.3%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.7%STAT: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.3%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.5%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 2.1%STAT: 1.5%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 6.8%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.2%STAT: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 8.3%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.8%STAT: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 12.8%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 2.6%STAT: 2.1%Indoctrination12.8%This article: 2.1%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 1.6%STAT: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Chelsea Cirruzzo: 3.8%STAT: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

952 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers39%attributed speech576writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKayla Bartkowski • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 38 words • 100.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 31 words • 100.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageProtect Our Care • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Woodhouse • 13 words • 100.0% coverageBrad Woodhouse • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 15 words • 100.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 62 words • 100.0% coverageSean Kaufman • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageSTAT Plus • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT Plus • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT Plus • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT Plus • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT Plus • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sean Kaufman

100%flagged-word coverage
268 attributed words71% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+45.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sean Kaufman: 45.5%45.5%Unattributed Quote+23.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sean Kaufman: 23.1%23.1%Quote-first Misdirection+19.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sean Kaufman: 19.4%19.4%Biased Writer Voice-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Sean Kaufman: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Sean Kaufman: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Sean Kaufman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.