Speaker summary
55% 8 analyzed articles/videos 308.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Kaufman results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 49.127 hits . Analysis detected 424.256 faulty-reasoning hits from 308.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (22,201 of 28,364 speakers). This Sean Kaufman is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Sean Kaufman
Speaker details
Total words: 308.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.7% percentile 14.7% BS Score8 analyzed videos308.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 35.4% 35.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Begging the Question: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst